| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
16/10/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
11/02/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
BORGES, A.; GONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, A.; ERNST, O.; CADENAZZI, M.; TERRA, J.A.; GUTIÉRREZ, L. |
|
Afiliación : |
ALEJANDRA BORGES, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; AGUSTÍN GONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; OSVALDO, ERNST, Departamento de Producción de Cultivos. EEMAC, Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; MÓNICA CADENAZZI, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUCÍA GUTIÉRREZ, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin. |
|
Título : |
Can spatial modeling substitute experimental design in agricultural experiments? |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Crop Science, 2018, v. 59, no. 1, p. 1-10. |
|
DOI : |
10.2135/cropsci2018.03.0177 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted paper, posted 10/05/18. Published online December, 13. 2018. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitute for good experimental design. MenosAbstract:
One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitut... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
EFFICIENCY STATISTICS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FIELD VARIABILITY; SPATIAL MODELS; UNIFORMITY TRIAL. |
|
Thesagro : |
DISENO ESTADISTICO; DISENO EXPERIMENTAL; MODELOS ESTADISTICOS; VARIABILIDAD. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
U30 Métodos de investigación |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02512naa a2200313 a 4500
001 1059193
005 2019-02-11
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.2135/cropsci2018.03.0177$2DOI
100 1 $aBORGES, A.
245 $aCan spatial modeling substitute experimental design in agricultural experiments?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aArticle history: Accepted paper, posted 10/05/18. Published online December, 13. 2018.
520 $aAbstract: One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitute for good experimental design.
650 $aDISENO ESTADISTICO
650 $aDISENO EXPERIMENTAL
650 $aMODELOS ESTADISTICOS
650 $aVARIABILIDAD
653 $aEFFICIENCY STATISTICS
653 $aEXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
653 $aFIELD VARIABILITY
653 $aSPATIAL MODELS
653 $aUNIFORMITY TRIAL
700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, A.
700 1 $aERNST, O.
700 1 $aCADENAZZI, M.
700 1 $aTERRA, J.A.
700 1 $aGUTIÉRREZ, L.
773 $tCrop Science, 2018$gv. 59, no. 1, p. 1-10.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
19/05/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
05/09/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
DONCEL, B.; PUENTES, J.D.; CAFFARENA, D.; RIET-CORREA, F.; COSTA, R.A. DA; GIANNITTI, F. |
|
Afiliación : |
BENJAMÍN DONCEL DÍAZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay./ Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia, Laboratorio de Patología Veterinaria.; JUAN D. PUENTES, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia, Laboratorio de Patología Veterinaria; RUBEN DARÍO CAFFARENA LEDESMA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay./ Departamento de Patología y Clínica de Rumiantes y Suinos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República (UdelaR), Montevideo, Uruguay.; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay./Graduate Program in Animal Science in the Tropics, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Brazil.; RICARDO ALMEIDA DA COSTA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FEDERICO GIANNITTI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Hypomagnesemia in beef cattle.[Hipomagnesemia em bovinos de corte.] |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, vol 41:e06826, 2021. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-6826 |
|
DOI : |
10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-6826 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received on December 7, 2020./Accepted for publication on December 21, 2020. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT. Hypomagnesemia is a major cause of death in grazing beef cows in countries of the Southern Hemisphere such as Argentina, Australia and New Zealand. Here we review the literature on hypomagnesemia in beef cattle and describe an outbreak in Uruguay. The
disease occurred in late autumn, affecting 6 to 11-year-old Aberdeen Angus and Hereford x Aberdeen Angus lactating multiparous cows in good body condition, grazing on natural grasslands that had been improved by fertilization and sowing of seeds of ryegrass and
oat. Approximately 40 out of 225 cows were affected and 24 (10.7%) died. A presumptive diagnosis of hypomagnesemia was established based on sudden death, acute neuromuscular clinical signs, epidemiological data, and the response to Mg administration. The diagnosis was
confirmed by detecting low Mg concentrations in serum (0.47-0.57mmol/L), vitreous humor (0.47-0.80mmol/L), aqueous humor (0.66mmol/L) and cerebrospinal fluid (0.59mmol/L). The largest component of the diet corresponding to fast-growing and exuberant forages of
ryegrass and oat had high concentrations of K (3.48%), N (4.38%) and P (0.94%), suggesting secondary hypomagnesemia. In addition, the K/(Ca+Mg) ratio was 2.38 in forages of ryegrass and oat (reference value: 2.2), and 0.15 in the soil (reference value: 0.09), which represent
risk factors for hypomagnesemia. In conclusion, hypomagnesemia is an important cause of mortality in beef cattle grazing improved natural grasslands in Uruguay and it can be easily prevented by correct seasonal Mg supplementation.
RESUMO:A hipomagnesemia é uma das principais causas de morte em vacas de corte em pastagem em países do Hemisfério Sul, como Argentina, Austrália e Nova Zelândia. Aqui, revisamos a literatura sobre hipomagnesemia em bovinos de corte e descrevemos um surto no Uruguai. A doença ocorreu no final do outono, afetando vacas Aberdeen Angus e Aberdeen Angus x Hereford de 6-11 anos de idade em boas condições corporais, lactantes, multíparas e pastando em campos naturais que foram melhorados com fertilização e plantio de azevém e aveia. Aproximadamente 40 de 225 vacas foram afetadas e 24 (10,7%) morreram. O diagnóstico presuntivo de hipomagnesemia foi estabelecido com base na morte súbita, sinais clínicos neuromusculares agudos, dados epidemiológicos e a resposta à administração de Mg. O diagnóstico foi confirmado pela detecção de baixos níveis de Mg no soro (0,47-0,57mmol/L), humor vítreo (0,47-0,80mmol/L), humor aquoso (0,66mmol/L) e líquido cefalorraquidiano (0,59mmol/L). O componente mais importante da dieta correspondia a pastagens de azevém e aveia de rápido crescimento, as quais apresentaram altas concentrações de K (3,48%), N (4,38%) e P (0,94%), que sugerem hipomagnesemia secundária. Além disso, a relação K/(Ca+Mg) foi de 2,38 em forragens de azevém e aveia (valor de referência: 2,2) e 0,15 no solo (valor de referência: 0,09), que representam fatores de risco para hipomagnesemia. Em conclusão, a hipomagnesemia é uma causa importante de mortalidade em gado de corte em pastagens naturais melhoradas no Uruguai e pode ser facilmente prevenida pela correta suplementação sazonal de Mg. MenosABSTRACT. Hypomagnesemia is a major cause of death in grazing beef cows in countries of the Southern Hemisphere such as Argentina, Australia and New Zealand. Here we review the literature on hypomagnesemia in beef cattle and describe an outbreak in Uruguay. The
disease occurred in late autumn, affecting 6 to 11-year-old Aberdeen Angus and Hereford x Aberdeen Angus lactating multiparous cows in good body condition, grazing on natural grasslands that had been improved by fertilization and sowing of seeds of ryegrass and
oat. Approximately 40 out of 225 cows were affected and 24 (10.7%) died. A presumptive diagnosis of hypomagnesemia was established based on sudden death, acute neuromuscular clinical signs, epidemiological data, and the response to Mg administration. The diagnosis was
confirmed by detecting low Mg concentrations in serum (0.47-0.57mmol/L), vitreous humor (0.47-0.80mmol/L), aqueous humor (0.66mmol/L) and cerebrospinal fluid (0.59mmol/L). The largest component of the diet corresponding to fast-growing and exuberant forages of
ryegrass and oat had high concentrations of K (3.48%), N (4.38%) and P (0.94%), suggesting secondary hypomagnesemia. In addition, the K/(Ca+Mg) ratio was 2.38 in forages of ryegrass and oat (reference value: 2.2), and 0.15 in the soil (reference value: 0.09), which represent
risk factors for hypomagnesemia. In conclusion, hypomagnesemia is an important cause of mortality in beef cattle grazing improved natural grasslands in Uruguay and ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
CATTLE; Grazing beef cattle; Hypomagnesemia; Improved natural pastures; MORTALITY; OAT; PLATAFORMA DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SALUD ANIMAL; PLATAFORMA DE SALUD ANIMAL; RYEGRASS. |
|
Thesagro : |
GANADO DE CORTE; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L73 Enfermedades de los animales |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16711/1/Pesq.-Vet.-Bras.-41e06826-2021.pdf
https://www.scielo.br/pdf/pvb/v41/1678-5150-pvb-41-e06826.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04298naa a2200337 a 4500
001 1062091
005 2022-09-05
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-6826$2DOI
100 1 $aDONCEL, B.
245 $aHypomagnesemia in beef cattle.[Hipomagnesemia em bovinos de corte.]$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received on December 7, 2020./Accepted for publication on December 21, 2020.
520 $aABSTRACT. Hypomagnesemia is a major cause of death in grazing beef cows in countries of the Southern Hemisphere such as Argentina, Australia and New Zealand. Here we review the literature on hypomagnesemia in beef cattle and describe an outbreak in Uruguay. The disease occurred in late autumn, affecting 6 to 11-year-old Aberdeen Angus and Hereford x Aberdeen Angus lactating multiparous cows in good body condition, grazing on natural grasslands that had been improved by fertilization and sowing of seeds of ryegrass and oat. Approximately 40 out of 225 cows were affected and 24 (10.7%) died. A presumptive diagnosis of hypomagnesemia was established based on sudden death, acute neuromuscular clinical signs, epidemiological data, and the response to Mg administration. The diagnosis was confirmed by detecting low Mg concentrations in serum (0.47-0.57mmol/L), vitreous humor (0.47-0.80mmol/L), aqueous humor (0.66mmol/L) and cerebrospinal fluid (0.59mmol/L). The largest component of the diet corresponding to fast-growing and exuberant forages of ryegrass and oat had high concentrations of K (3.48%), N (4.38%) and P (0.94%), suggesting secondary hypomagnesemia. In addition, the K/(Ca+Mg) ratio was 2.38 in forages of ryegrass and oat (reference value: 2.2), and 0.15 in the soil (reference value: 0.09), which represent risk factors for hypomagnesemia. In conclusion, hypomagnesemia is an important cause of mortality in beef cattle grazing improved natural grasslands in Uruguay and it can be easily prevented by correct seasonal Mg supplementation. RESUMO:A hipomagnesemia é uma das principais causas de morte em vacas de corte em pastagem em países do Hemisfério Sul, como Argentina, Austrália e Nova Zelândia. Aqui, revisamos a literatura sobre hipomagnesemia em bovinos de corte e descrevemos um surto no Uruguai. A doença ocorreu no final do outono, afetando vacas Aberdeen Angus e Aberdeen Angus x Hereford de 6-11 anos de idade em boas condições corporais, lactantes, multíparas e pastando em campos naturais que foram melhorados com fertilização e plantio de azevém e aveia. Aproximadamente 40 de 225 vacas foram afetadas e 24 (10,7%) morreram. O diagnóstico presuntivo de hipomagnesemia foi estabelecido com base na morte súbita, sinais clínicos neuromusculares agudos, dados epidemiológicos e a resposta à administração de Mg. O diagnóstico foi confirmado pela detecção de baixos níveis de Mg no soro (0,47-0,57mmol/L), humor vítreo (0,47-0,80mmol/L), humor aquoso (0,66mmol/L) e líquido cefalorraquidiano (0,59mmol/L). O componente mais importante da dieta correspondia a pastagens de azevém e aveia de rápido crescimento, as quais apresentaram altas concentrações de K (3,48%), N (4,38%) e P (0,94%), que sugerem hipomagnesemia secundária. Além disso, a relação K/(Ca+Mg) foi de 2,38 em forragens de azevém e aveia (valor de referência: 2,2) e 0,15 no solo (valor de referência: 0,09), que representam fatores de risco para hipomagnesemia. Em conclusão, a hipomagnesemia é uma causa importante de mortalidade em gado de corte em pastagens naturais melhoradas no Uruguai e pode ser facilmente prevenida pela correta suplementação sazonal de Mg.
650 $aGANADO DE CORTE
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aCATTLE
653 $aGrazing beef cattle
653 $aHypomagnesemia
653 $aImproved natural pastures
653 $aMORTALITY
653 $aOAT
653 $aPLATAFORMA DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SALUD ANIMAL
653 $aPLATAFORMA DE SALUD ANIMAL
653 $aRYEGRASS
700 1 $aPUENTES, J.D.
700 1 $aCAFFARENA, D.
700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F.
700 1 $aCOSTA, R.A. DA
700 1 $aGIANNITTI, F.
773 $tPesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, vol 41:e06826, 2021. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-6826
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
